Turnbull China Bikeride/Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso/BARNET/ARMLINUX/MAIL/9710/000104_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Sat Oct 25 18:37:55 1997.msg

Internet Message Format | 1997-11-30 | 2KB

Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
    by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA13488
    for <[e-mail]>; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 18:37:53 +0100
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 7689]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <1928-27154>; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 20:37:40 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971070-249>; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 13:35:59 -0400
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net ([163.164.160.3] EHLO snowcrash.cymru.net ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 1260]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <971089-249>; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 13:35:43 -0400
Received: (from alan@localhost) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.5-q-beta3/8.7.1) id SAA22045; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 18:35:09 +0100
From: Alan Cox <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Mail Strip (Was pipex)
To: [e-mail] (Russell King - ARM Linux Admin)
Date:     Sat, 25 Oct 1997 18:35:06 +0100 (BST)
Cc: [e-mail]
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]> from "Russell King - ARM Linux Admin" at Oct 25, 97 09:50:36 am
Content-Type: text
X-Orcpt: rfc822;[e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Isn't this automatic acknowledgement depreciated by some RFC or something
> like that?  ie.  the only time that an acknowledgement is generated is
> if the sender specifically asks for one?

Quite specifically so

Can I suggest simply deleting all argonet users from the vger lists
indefinitely